The journal now follows a two-stage review process. Upon receipt,
your manuscript is first screened by the editor who may suggest changes
regarding the content and format of the paper. The purpose of this phase
of the review is to get your manuscript in optimal form for the peer
review process.
After your paper has been
revised and passed the initial editorial review, it is sent to two or
more referees which will suggest additional changes.
The editor and referees
evaluate your article according to the
following criteria:
- Does the article present original ideas and content?
- Is the article written in a clear and concise manner with good
organization?
- Are the scientific principles of the article communicated
effectively?
- Does the article maintain high standards of academic excellence?
- Does the article clearly distinguish between speculative and
substantiated claims?
- Does the article cite relevant prior research and their
relationship to the claims of the article?
- Does the article address an important topic related to space
mixing?
The journal aims to inform authors whether their manuscript has been
accepted or rejected within six weeks. If rejected, the author will be
provided a list of reasons for the rejection. In many instances, authors
will be informed of improvements that must be made before a decision of
acceptance can be made.